Using IronPDF as an alternative to PDFSharp

The video transcript provides a detailed comparison between IronPDF and PDF Sharp, highlighting the key differences in their functionalities and ease of use. PDF Sharp requires the installation of three libraries—PDF Sharp, System.Drawing.Common, and System.Text.Encoding.CodePages—via the NuGet package manager. It involves complex coding to create and manipulate PDFs, which can be cumbersome for developers. In contrast, IronPDF simplifies the process by requiring only its library installation. Its integration with HTML and CSS allows for easier customization and rendering of web pages into PDFs. IronPDF maintains the UI and responsiveness of the original web content, making it a more efficient tool for developers. The video concludes that IronPDF supports essential aspects of PDF creation and customization, which are crucial for impactful PDF libraries, whereas PDF Sharp's lack of support for HTML and CSS makes customization challenging. The comparison serves as a guide for developers to choose the right tool for their PDF generation needs.

Further Reading: Using IronPDF as an alternative to PDFSharp